From ragnarok@pobox.com Wed Jun 13 20:48:30 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: raganok@intrex.net X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_3); 14 Jun 2001 03:48:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 70743 invoked from network); 14 Jun 2001 03:48:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l7.egroups.com with QMQP; 14 Jun 2001 03:48:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO intrex.net) (209.42.192.246) by mta1 with SMTP; 14 Jun 2001 03:48:29 -0000 Received: from Craig [209.42.200.34] by intrex.net (SMTPD32-5.05) id A4235EF400B2; Wed, 13 Jun 2001 23:48:51 -0400 Reply-To: To: Subject: RE: [lojban] Attitudinals again (was: Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 23:48:32 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 X-eGroups-From: "Craig" From: "Craig" >A difference is only a difference if it makes a difference. I see there is >a difference in the character string. Is there a difference in meaning? Not in English - you're being linguistically biased again. In one, the important part is the feeling. In the other, it is the going. Either one expresses both, however. Oh wait, I was calmly shutting up about attitudinals. I hope this isn't to controversial, if it turns out it is ignore me! --la kreig.daniyl 'segu temci fa le bavli gi mi'o ba renvi lo purci .i ga la fonxa cu janbe gi du mi' -la djimis.BYFet xy.sy. gubmau ckiku cmesanji: 0x5C3A1E74