From xod@sixgirls.org Thu Jun 14 12:41:41 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: xod@reva.sixgirls.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_3); 14 Jun 2001 19:41:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 86937 invoked from network); 14 Jun 2001 19:41:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by l10.egroups.com with QMQP; 14 Jun 2001 19:41:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO reva.sixgirls.org) (64.152.7.13) by mta3 with SMTP; 14 Jun 2001 19:41:41 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by reva.sixgirls.org (8.11.3/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f5EJfew12376 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 15:41:40 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 15:41:39 -0400 (EDT) To: Subject: Re: [lojban] Attitudinals again (was: Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20010614152905.00dca460@127.0.0.1> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII From: Invent Yourself On Thu, 14 Jun 2001, Bob LeChevalier (lojbab) wrote: > At 11:45 PM 06/13/2001 -0400, you wrote: > >On Thu, 14 Jun 2001, Jorge Llambias wrote: > > > In the first one you are displaying your feeling of happiness > > > about ko'a going. In the second one you are not necessarily > > > displaying any feeling at all. > > > >You displayed it through the use of "gleki". > > No. He CLAIMED it - he might have done so in a monotone, and he might have > falsely claimed it. Assertions can be true or false. Emotional displays > simply ARE. With a fake smile or a contrived tantrum, emotional displays can be faked. They are assertions of ones feelings, no? ----- We do not like And if a cat those Rs and Ds, needed a hat? Who can't resist Free enterprise more subsidies. is there for that!