From jjllambias@hotmail.com Thu Jun 14 19:11:42 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: jjllambias@hotmail.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_3); 15 Jun 2001 02:11:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 19523 invoked from network); 15 Jun 2001 02:11:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l9.egroups.com with QMQP; 15 Jun 2001 02:11:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (216.33.241.191) by mta1 with SMTP; 15 Jun 2001 02:11:41 -0000 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 19:11:41 -0700 Received: from 200.41.247.54 by lw8fd.law8.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 02:11:40 GMT X-Originating-IP: [200.41.247.54] To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Bcc: Subject: Re: [lojban] If it ain't broke, don't fix it (was an approach to attitudinals) Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 02:11:40 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Jun 2001 02:11:41.0076 (UTC) FILETIME=[842F0540:01C0F540] From: "Jorge Llambias" la ritcrd di'e cusku >Keep in mind that most of us are not trying to tie down the meaning of >the attitudinals (quite the opposite, in fact); we're trying to define >their relationship to the rest of the sentence in a way that both opens >up possibilities and is more clear. i ui noda ka'e dujgau le smuni be lei valsi i ma'a ka'e pilno vy gi'e troci le nu le bangu cu sarxe i ku'i na bapli >All this arguing is really addicting, I admit, but does anything ever >actually get resolved in this forum? i su'oroi go'i i cafne fa le nu lo selcasnu cu rapli li so'i pu le nu lo simlu be le nu tugni cu tolcanci >Is the procedure basically to type >and type until one side's fingers get too weary to continue? And even >in that case, does one side 'win'? i u'i le se pluta cu du le pluta i jinga da poi traji le ka se zdile mu'o mi'e xorxes _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.