From jjllambias@hotmail.com Fri Jun 15 07:42:33 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: jjllambias@hotmail.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_3); 15 Jun 2001 14:42:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 5015 invoked from network); 15 Jun 2001 14:42:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by m8.onelist.org with QMQP; 15 Jun 2001 14:42:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (216.33.240.134) by mta1 with SMTP; 15 Jun 2001 14:42:32 -0000 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 07:42:32 -0700 Received: from 200.49.74.2 by lw8fd.law8.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 14:42:32 GMT X-Originating-IP: [200.49.74.2] To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Bcc: Subject: Re: [lojban] Are attitudinals assertions? (was: Attitudinals again (was: Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 14:42:32 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Jun 2001 14:42:32.0297 (UTC) FILETIME=[68CDCD90:01C0F5A9] From: "Jorge Llambias" la xod cusku di'e >Is pe'i different from mi jinvi le du'u? Yes, there is about the same difference between {pe'i} and {jinvi} as between {ui} and {gleki}. >All this proves is that go'i refers to the bridi, and not to the UI. I >agree. But my issue is not that UI are not bridi, but that UI are not? >assertions. Maybe we have a different understanding of what an assertion is. How can you have an assertion without a bridi? Is a smile an assertion to you? mu'o mi'e xorxes _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.