Subject: Re: [lojban] Are attitudinals assertions? (was: Attitudinals again (was: Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis

From: "Jorge Llambias" <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 14:42:32

la xod cusku di'e

>Is pe'i different from mi jinvi le du'u?

Yes, there is about the same difference between
{pe'i} and {jinvi} as between {ui} and {gleki}.

>All this proves is that go'i refers to the bridi, and not to the UI. I
>agree. But my issue is not that UI are not bridi, but that UI are not?
>assertions.

Maybe we have a different understanding of what an assertion is.
How can you have an assertion without a bridi? Is a smile an
assertion to you?

mu'o mi'e xorxes

_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.