From xod@sixgirls.org Fri Jun 15 08:15:35 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: xod@reva.sixgirls.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_3); 15 Jun 2001 15:15:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 5244 invoked from network); 15 Jun 2001 15:15:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by l10.egroups.com with QMQP; 15 Jun 2001 15:15:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO reva.sixgirls.org) (64.152.7.13) by mta2 with SMTP; 15 Jun 2001 15:15:33 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by reva.sixgirls.org (8.11.3/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f5FFFXE08594 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 11:15:33 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 11:15:32 -0400 (EDT) To: Subject: Re: [lojban] Are attitudinals assertions? (was: Attitudinals again (was: Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII From: Invent Yourself On Fri, 15 Jun 2001, Jorge Llambias wrote: > >All this proves is that go'i refers to the bridi, and not to the UI. I > >agree. But my issue is not that UI are not bridi, but that UI are not? > >assertions. > > Maybe we have a different understanding of what an assertion is. > How can you have an assertion without a bridi? Is a smile an > assertion to you? Isn't it? If not, why not? How are you defining "assertion"? ----- We do not like And if a cat those Rs and Ds, needed a hat? Who can't resist Free enterprise more subsidies. is there for that!