From graywyvern@hotmail.com Fri Jun 15 09:23:28 2001
Return-Path: <graywyvern@hotmail.com>
X-Sender: graywyvern@hotmail.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_3); 15 Jun 2001 16:23:28 -0000
Received: (qmail 23125 invoked from network); 15 Jun 2001 16:21:27 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l8.egroups.com with QMQP; 15 Jun 2001 16:21:27 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (216.33.237.56) by mta1 with SMTP; 15 Jun 2001 16:21:27 -0000
Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 09:21:27 -0700
Received: from 65.67.96.113 by lw7fd.law7.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP;	Fri, 15 Jun 2001 16:21:27 GMT
X-Originating-IP: [65.67.96.113]
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Bcc: 
Subject: Re: [lojban] hope
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 16:21:27 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
Message-ID: <F56Hbx4Rrnu2CCbJz9K0000fe51@hotmail.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Jun 2001 16:21:27.0424 (UTC) FILETIME=[3A6A5000:01C0F5B7]
From: "michael helsem" <graywyvern@hotmail.com>

>From: "Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>
li'o
>Maybe {a'o da nu mi klama} is closer to what you meant.
>

possibly. i was looking for a way to use ".a'o" for a potential.
both ".a'o ba" & ".a'o nu'o" seem to miss. i wonder if future
lojbanists will end up using "pacna ledu'u" exclusively for this
sort of optative statement....

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com


