From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Fri Jun 15 11:55:50 2001
Return-Path: <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>
X-Sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_3); 15 Jun 2001 18:55:50 -0000
Received: (qmail 15860 invoked from network); 15 Jun 2001 18:55:49 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by l8.egroups.com with QMQP; 15 Jun 2001 18:55:49 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.169.75.101) by mta2 with SMTP; 15 Jun 2001 18:55:49 -0000
Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 15Ayku-0002fW-00 for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 11:55:40 -0700
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 11:55:40 -0700
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] If it ain't broke, don't fix it (was an approach to attitudinals)
Message-ID: <20010615115540.G14438@digitalkingdom.org>
Mail-Followup-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
References: <Pine.NEB.4.33.0106142109580.27934-100000@reva.sixgirls.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.4.33.0106142109580.27934-100000@reva.sixgirls.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.18i
From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>

On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 09:11:54PM -0400, Invent Yourself wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Jun 2001 pycyn@aol.com wrote:
> 
> > In a message dated 6/14/2001 6:30:41 PM Central Daylight Time,
> > lojbab@lojban.org writes:
> >
> >
> >
> > > >.a'unaicai pe'idai le nu fanva la .alis. cu palci .ianai .u'e >
> >
> >
> >
> > Back to the beginning then. I would like to point out that I understood from
> > the beginning what xod meant to say and my point was -- and still is -- that
> > he failed to say it. None of the attitudinals involved are problematic in
> > the sense of changing the truth value of the claim, which remains that
> > translating Alice is evil. xod expresses strong repulsion for this
> > situation, disbelief in it and wonder at it. He also gives as his support
> > for the claim that I (or someone unspecified) think it. But he still asserts
> > it.
> 
> 
> 
> Give it up. You are wrong. The Book clearly shows that a'u is a
> propositional attitude indicator. Page 302.

You weren't using .a'u. You were using pe'idai. Much less obvious.

-Robin

-- 
http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ BTW, I'm male, honest.
le datni cu djica le nu zifre .iku'i .oi le so'e datni cu to'e te pilno
je xlali -- RLP http://www.lojban.org/

