From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Fri Jun 15 15:28:38 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_3); 15 Jun 2001 22:28:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 16079 invoked from network); 15 Jun 2001 22:28:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by m8.onelist.org with QMQP; 15 Jun 2001 22:28:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.169.75.101) by mta3 with SMTP; 15 Jun 2001 22:28:36 -0000 Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 15B24w-000422-00 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 15:28:34 -0700 Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 15:28:34 -0700 To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] Are attitudinals assertions? (was: Attitudinals again (was: Sapi... Message-ID: <20010615152834.O14438@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com References: <12a.1dd7a4.285be57d@aol.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <12a.1dd7a4.285be57d@aol.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.18i From: Robin Lee Powell On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 06:26:05PM -0400, pycyn@aol.com wrote: > In a message dated 6/15/2001 4:52:34 PM Central Daylight Time, > xod@sixgirls.org writes: > > > > Isn't it? If not, why not? How are you defining "assertion"? > > > > ! Aren't > there some miinimum requirements for playing in the metagame? According to you, yes. But some of us (gasp! horror!) aren't philosopher or linguists or logicians. You know, your insistence that those of us who don't know as much about logic as you expect rather reminds me of my insistence that you should know more about computers and the internet before you speak up. So, one way or another you're being a hypocrite. Please pick one. -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ BTW, I'm male, honest. le datni cu djica le nu zifre .iku'i .oi le so'e datni cu to'e te pilno je xlali -- RLP http://www.lojban.org/