From cmeclax@gmx.co.uk Mon Jun 18 15:36:06 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: cmeclax@ixazon.dynip.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_3); 18 Jun 2001 22:36:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 44535 invoked from network); 18 Jun 2001 22:36:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by l7.egroups.com with QMQP; 18 Jun 2001 22:36:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO neofelis.ixazon.lan) (207.15.133.15) by mta2 with SMTP; 18 Jun 2001 22:36:04 -0000 Received: by neofelis.ixazon.lan (Postfix, from userid 504) id 41C493C5E0; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 18:30:33 -0400 (EDT) To: Subject: pgp Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 18:27:47 -0400 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.0.29.2] Content-Type: text/plain References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01061818303208.25028@neofelis> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: cmeclax@ixazon.dynip.com From: cmeclax po'u le cmevi'u ke'umri -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 de'i Wed, 13 Jun 2001 la kreig cusku di'e > xy.sy. gubmau ckiku cmesanji: 0x5C3A1E74 I don't think "cmesanji" is right; PGP keys aren't conscious of their names. What's a better term for a key ID? What does "xy.sy." stand for? cmeclax -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE7LoEIBETrxUjAxlERAllyAKCtkkSzQYXPHZcM+5C49f6dFWM8dgCeIP+D BVt427/xCpSq1C7z+8Po/Go= =/Jqj -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----