From xod@sixgirls.org Tue Jun 19 22:16:30 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: xod@reva.sixgirls.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_3); 20 Jun 2001 05:16:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 98917 invoked from network); 20 Jun 2001 05:16:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by l10.egroups.com with QMQP; 20 Jun 2001 05:16:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO reva.sixgirls.org) (64.152.7.13) by mta3 with SMTP; 20 Jun 2001 05:16:29 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by reva.sixgirls.org (8.11.3/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f5K5GSE22357 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 01:16:28 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 01:16:27 -0400 (EDT) To: Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: possible worlds In-Reply-To: <20010620005240.A4675@twcny.rr.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII From: Invent Yourself On Wed, 20 Jun 2001, Rob Speer wrote: > .i la kokofint. zo'o pu cusku di'e > > > Eep. No. Even I, the vehement supporter of more widespread use of logical > > > connectives, say that you absolutely can't translate that with {ganai} or > > > anything of the sort. Since the statement presupposes that you are not rich, > > > the {ganai mi ricfu} part is necessarily true. > > > > > > > > u'i .i ga'inai .e'o ko skicu le krinu be le si'o lu ganai li'u cu xlali > > .i pukiku le notci befi la xorxes. cu tolcliva calenu mi ciska de'u > .i mi galfi jinvi fi lenu ta'i ma cusku .ei tu'a le cumki munje > .i mi galfi lemi notci .iku'i mi na galfi le pamoi selju'a > > .i nau pe'i xamgu fa lenu pilno lu ganaida'i broda gi brode li'u ki'u lenu > claxu lo te cuxna mi na zgana le do notci be fi xy. .i pe'i lu ganai li'u na'o ralju le tadji be le nu fanva zoi zoi. if, then .zoi .iepei ----- We do not like And if a cat those Rs and Ds, needed a hat? Who can't resist Free enterprise more subsidies. is there for that!