From jjllambias@hotmail.com Wed Jun 20 16:25:18 2001
Return-Path: <jjllambias@hotmail.com>
X-Sender: jjllambias@hotmail.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_3); 20 Jun 2001 23:25:18 -0000
Received: (qmail 16996 invoked from network); 20 Jun 2001 23:25:17 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by l7.egroups.com with QMQP; 20 Jun 2001 23:25:17 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (216.33.241.21) by mta2 with SMTP; 20 Jun 2001 23:25:17 -0000
Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 16:25:17 -0700
Received: from 200.69.11.206 by lw8fd.law8.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP;	Wed, 20 Jun 2001 23:25:17 GMT
X-Originating-IP: [200.69.11.206]
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Bcc: 
Subject: Re: [lojban] da'i (for a change)
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 23:25:17 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
Message-ID: <F21MZQu5Snz8kxpycYG00018ba8@hotmail.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 20 Jun 2001 23:25:17.0743 (UTC) FILETIME=[4421CBF0:01C0F9E0]
From: "Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>


la pycyn cusku di'e

>noda zo'u ge da numcu gi node gi'e numcu gi'i balzma da da'o.i

You have to admit that interpreting you is almost as hard as
interpreting any one else of us. My interpretation:

noda zo'u ge da namcu gi node namcu gi'e balzma da da'o i

>.iseni'i di goi le sumji be xy bei li
>pa zo'u ge di numcu gi di balzma xy .

(Every {iseni'i} should be {iseni'ibo}.)

Shouldn't it be {di no'u le sumji be ...} instead of {goi} here?
{le sumji...} is presumably already assigned, and {di} is not
an assignable variable.

>..i di'u cipra te zukte

{la'e di'u}? And is it really {cipra}? I think I have used
{je'urja'o} for the demonstration sense of proof.

i melbi nu je'urja'o

mu'o mi'e xorxes


_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.