From xod@sixgirls.org Thu Jun 21 17:37:09 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: xod@reva.sixgirls.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_3); 22 Jun 2001 00:37:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 73571 invoked from network); 22 Jun 2001 00:37:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by l10.egroups.com with QMQP; 22 Jun 2001 00:37:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO reva.sixgirls.org) (64.152.7.13) by mta2 with SMTP; 22 Jun 2001 00:37:08 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by reva.sixgirls.org (8.11.3/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f5M0b7M12996 for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 20:37:07 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 20:37:06 -0400 (EDT) To: Subject: Re: [lojban] mi prami la lojban .iku'i... In-Reply-To: <20010621172645.C8816@digitalkingdom.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII From: Invent Yourself On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 08:19:22PM -0400, Invent Yourself wrote: > > On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, Rob Speer wrote: > > > I think a bigger flaw with the numbers is the {re} / {rei} one that > > > was just pointed out. Here I was trying to impress the hex digits in > > > my memory and I never even noticed that two digits are as > > > indistinguishable as two different words can possibly be. What > > > happened to making the numbers all audibly distinct? It worked for > > > all the rest of the digits. > > > > > > > > ki'u ma ciska le porsi be tai le namcu valsi .enai le namcu lerfu .i > > namcu valsi sepi'o le zumbacru .e le zumpensi .e ru'e le zumciska > > .i ku'i ma lerfu la lojban zo rei ka'u zo .ebu ----- We do not like And if a cat those Rs and Ds, needed a hat? Who can't resist Free enterprise more subsidies. is there for that!