From lojbab@lojban.org Fri Jun 22 22:15:25 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojbab@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_3); 23 Jun 2001 05:15:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 76523 invoked from network); 23 Jun 2001 05:15:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by l10.egroups.com with QMQP; 23 Jun 2001 05:15:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO stmpy-1.cais.net) (205.252.14.71) by mta3 with SMTP; 23 Jun 2001 05:15:24 -0000 Received: from bob.lojban.org (53.dynamic.cais.com [207.226.56.53]) by stmpy-1.cais.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f5N5FL515416 for ; Sat, 23 Jun 2001 01:15:22 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20010623001917.00d5e3f0@127.0.0.1> X-Sender: vir1036/pop.cais.com@127.0.0.1 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2 Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 01:20:01 -0400 To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] Normal In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed From: "Bob LeChevalier (lojbab)" At 11:55 PM 06/22/2001 +0000, Jorge Llambias wrote: >la lojbab cusku di'e > > > >Okay, how about cafna'o for mode, > > > >cafrai > >Isn't cafne rather about time? It isn't clear - we seem to be missing a place on that one, no matter how you interpret it. I don't think I intended it to be limited to time (if only because Lojban tries to minimize distinction between time and space, and the placer structure doesn't allow for that either). >How about {fadrai}? I'm not sure about that one. Other possibilities are raprai and kaunrai. lojbab -- lojbab lojbab@lojban.org Bob LeChevalier, President, The Logical Language Group, Inc. 2904 Beau Lane, Fairfax VA 22031-1303 USA 703-385-0273 Artificial language Loglan/Lojban: http://www.lojban.org