From lojbab@lojban.org Sun Jun 24 16:42:56 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojbab@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_3); 24 Jun 2001 23:42:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 7971 invoked from network); 24 Jun 2001 23:42:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by l8.egroups.com with QMQP; 24 Jun 2001 23:42:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO stmpy-2.cais.net) (205.252.14.72) by mta2 with SMTP; 24 Jun 2001 23:42:55 -0000 Received: from bob.lojban.org (dynamic231.cl8.cais.net [205.177.20.231]) by stmpy-2.cais.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f5ONgsY84773 for ; Sun, 24 Jun 2001 19:42:54 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20010624194525.00d337c0@127.0.0.1> X-Sender: vir1036/pop.cais.com@127.0.0.1 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2 Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 19:47:31 -0400 To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] koko & jai In-Reply-To: <9h4gm2+8cmb@eGroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed From: "Bob LeChevalier (lojbab)" At 10:50 AM 06/24/2001 +0000, A.W.T. wrote: >I'd like to know your opinions on two topics. > >1) ko ko kurji: > >Isn't it pleonasm using {ko} two times here? Shouldn't this case be >treated like other phrases with {ko} e.g. ko prami mi, da/lo >renma (cu) prami ko, hence: ko kurji do or do kurji ko? >ko ko kurji means BOTH ko kurji do and do kurji ko at once. As for the others, ko mi prami is just as valid as ko prami mi. lojbab -- lojbab lojbab@lojban.org Bob LeChevalier, President, The Logical Language Group, Inc. 2904 Beau Lane, Fairfax VA 22031-1303 USA 703-385-0273 Artificial language Loglan/Lojban: http://www.lojban.org