From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Wed Jun 27 09:28:50 2001
Return-Path: <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>
X-Sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_3); 27 Jun 2001 16:28:50 -0000
Received: (qmail 75324 invoked from network); 27 Jun 2001 16:28:28 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by m8.onelist.org with QMQP; 27 Jun 2001 16:28:28 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.169.75.101) by mta1 with SMTP; 27 Jun 2001 16:28:28 -0000
Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 15FIB0-00015i-00 for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 09:28:26 -0700
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 09:28:26 -0700
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] t-shirts.
Message-ID: <20010627092826.P8816@digitalkingdom.org>
Mail-Followup-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
References: <a7.fff9d21.286b4990@aol.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <a7.fff9d21.286b4990@aol.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.18i
From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>

On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 10:37:04AM -0400, pycyn@aol.com wrote:
> Boring as it may seem, we havwe gotten along for years with 
> e'o ko sarji la lojban 

Hey, that works.

> (and you can put it in tengwar, if it will make you happy).

Someone, it may have been you, mentioned that tengwar has some obvious
deficiencies, but I never saw a complete explanation (presumably because
such an explanation was given a long time ago, but that doesn't help
me).

-Robin

-- 
http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ BTW, I'm male, honest.
le datni cu djica le nu zifre .iku'i .oi le so'e datni cu to'e te pilno
je xlali -- RLP http://www.lojban.org/

