From lojbab@lojban.org Wed Jun 27 11:17:24 2001
Return-Path: <lojbab@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojbab@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_3); 27 Jun 2001 18:17:24 -0000
Received: (qmail 58182 invoked from network); 27 Jun 2001 18:16:39 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by l9.egroups.com with QMQP; 27 Jun 2001 18:16:39 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO stmpy-4.cais.net) (205.252.14.74) by mta2 with SMTP; 27 Jun 2001 18:16:39 -0000
Received: from bob.lojban.org (209-8-89-170.dynamic.cais.com [209.8.89.170]) by stmpy-4.cais.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f5RIGch62369 for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 14:16:38 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20010627142033.00d9e240@127.0.0.1>
X-Sender: vir1036/pop.cais.com@127.0.0.1
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 14:21:28 -0400
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] t-shirts.
In-Reply-To: <20010627103853.R8816@digitalkingdom.org>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.33.0106270834120.13556-100000@ucsub.colorado.edu> <Pine.GSO.4.33.0106270834120.13556-100000@ucsub.colorado.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
From: "Bob LeChevalier (lojbab)" <lojbab@lojban.org>

At 10:38 AM 06/27/2001 -0700, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> > Is there a high quality version of the LLG logo floating around? Does
> > the LLG have a problem with such a usage of the logo?
>
>Dunno. lojbab?

Probably not, but we oughta discuss it at LogFest first before I give a 
blanket OK.

lojbab
--
lojbab lojbab@lojban.org
Bob LeChevalier, President, The Logical Language Group, Inc.
2904 Beau Lane, Fairfax VA 22031-1303 USA 703-385-0273
Artificial language Loglan/Lojban: http://www.lojban.org


