From graywyvern@hotmail.com Fri Jul 06 09:20:59 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: graywyvern@hotmail.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_2_0); 6 Jul 2001 16:20:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 30214 invoked from network); 6 Jul 2001 16:20:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by m8.onelist.org with QMQP; 6 Jul 2001 16:20:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (216.33.237.84) by mta1 with SMTP; 6 Jul 2001 16:20:49 -0000 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Fri, 6 Jul 2001 09:20:48 -0700 Received: from 65.67.96.113 by lw7fd.law7.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Fri, 06 Jul 2001 16:20:48 GMT X-Originating-IP: [65.67.96.113] To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Bcc: Subject: Re: [lojban] Uses of Language Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2001 16:20:48 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Jul 2001 16:20:48.0885 (UTC) FILETIME=[9E1E7A50:01C10637] From: "michael helsem" >From: "Jorge Llambias" li'o >I would say they have the same function >but different form. Before we do classifications of function, >I think we should concentrate on the classifications of form. >Form and function are not isomorphic in Lojban any more than >in any other language, even though probably someone at some point >claimed that they were or should be. > fu'ebe'unai.u'a.i'o ba'e ba'o pagre pe'a fu'o co'omi'e maikl. _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com