Subject: Re: [lojban] Rafsi in cmene

From: Björn Gohla <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2001 11:57:40 +0200

On Sunday 08 July 2001 02:14, Nick Nicholas wrote:
> Pierre has pointed out to me that cmene like vocac. are misleading for
> hours, because cac. is not a rafsi of cacra. To be consistent with the
> other time milestones, this would mean vocacr. instead.
>
> 1) Do we want to inflict unpronouncables like vocacr. on our audience? (My
> take is, why not --- I'm now saying 12-hour time is dispreferred anyway,
> and vocacr. is not that much more unpronouncable than la .r,l)

looks very pronouncable to me, provided syllabic l and r (as in sanskrit) are 
permitted. 

- -- 
- --------------------
/* Nobody will ever see this message :-) */
panic("Cannot initialize video hardware\n");
2.0.38 /usr/src/linux/arch/m68k/atari/atafb.c
pub 1024D/834F4976 2001-01-07 Björn Gohla (Wissenschaftler, Weltbürger) 
<[email-masked]>
Key fingerprint = 9FF4 FEDA CCDF DA0E 14D5 8129 6C14 3C39 834F 4976
sub 1024g/29571FE2 2001-01-07