From b.gohla@gmx.de Sun Jul 08 05:53:56 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: b.gohla@gmx.de X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_2_0); 8 Jul 2001 12:53:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 5217 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2001 12:53:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by m8.onelist.org with QMQP; 8 Jul 2001 12:53:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.gmx.net) (194.221.183.20) by mta2 with SMTP; 8 Jul 2001 12:53:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 7748 invoked by uid 0); 8 Jul 2001 12:53:53 -0000 Received: from a9b3b.pppool.de (HELO linux) (213.6.155.59) by mail.gmx.net (mail07) with SMTP; 8 Jul 2001 12:53:53 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Reply-To: b.gohla@gmx.de To: Nick Nicholas , lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] Rafsi in cmene Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2001 11:57:40 +0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01070811574000.00865@linux> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: =?utf-8?q?Bj=C3=B6rn=20Gohla?= -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sunday 08 July 2001 02:14, Nick Nicholas wrote: > Pierre has pointed out to me that cmene like vocac. are misleading for > hours, because cac. is not a rafsi of cacra. To be consistent with the > other time milestones, this would mean vocacr. instead. > > 1) Do we want to inflict unpronouncables like vocacr. on our audience? (M= y > take is, why not --- I'm now saying 12-hour time is dispreferred anyway, > and vocacr. is not that much more unpronouncable than la .r,l) looks very pronouncable to me, provided syllabic l and r (as in sanskrit) a= re=20 permitted.=20 - --=20 - -------------------- /* Nobody will ever see this message :-) */ panic("Cannot initialize video hardware\n"); 2.0.38 /usr/src/linux/arch/m68k/atari/atafb.c pub 1024D/834F4976 2001-01-07 Bj=C3=B6rn Gohla (Wissenschaftler, Weltb=C3= =BCrger)=20 Key fingerprint =3D 9FF4 FEDA CCDF DA0E 14D5 8129 6C14 3C39 834F 4976 sub 1024g/29571FE2 2001-01-07 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE7SC6abBQ8OYNPSXYRAhNYAJ46FYMZ4986h5FFLjbIOM2UFVmy4wCfT0LD +PYOV2BwB2q9Zp3LC8+XM8s=3D =3DDppw -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----