From araizen@newmail.net Sun Jul 08 08:54:53 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: araizen@newmail.net X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_2_0); 8 Jul 2001 15:54:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 35284 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2001 15:54:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by m8.onelist.org with QMQP; 8 Jul 2001 15:54:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO fh.egroups.com) (10.1.2.135) by mta1 with SMTP; 8 Jul 2001 15:54:53 -0000 X-eGroups-Return: araizen@newmail.net Received: from [10.1.10.67] by fh.egroups.com with NNFMP; 08 Jul 2001 15:54:53 -0000 Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2001 15:54:51 -0000 To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: Rafsi in cmene Message-ID: <9i9vob+4dum@eGroups.com> In-Reply-To: User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Length: 326 X-Mailer: eGroups Message Poster X-Originating-IP: 62.0.181.211 From: "Adam Raizen" la nitcion cusku di'e > ... vocac. ... Personally, I really hate all these cmene which are supposed to be analyzable. It's only slightly better than la foroKLAK. What's wrong with something like "le vomoi cacra", so that a basic idea of what was meant can be figured out from the language's regular grammar. mu'o mi'e adam