From cowan@ccil.org Sun Jul 08 09:39:20 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: cowan@mercury.ccil.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_2_0); 8 Jul 2001 16:39:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 98750 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2001 16:39:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by l9.egroups.com with QMQP; 8 Jul 2001 16:39:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mercury.ccil.org) (192.190.237.100) by mta3 with SMTP; 8 Jul 2001 16:39:19 -0000 Received: from cowan by mercury.ccil.org with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 15JHab-0007kQ-00 for ; Sun, 08 Jul 2001 12:39:21 -0400 Subject: Re: [lojban] Rafsi in cmene In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20010708043339.00d6d970@127.0.0.1> from "Bob LeChevalier (lojbab)" at "Jul 8, 2001 04:39:14 am" To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2001 12:39:21 -0400 (EDT) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL66 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: X-eGroups-From: John Cowan From: John Cowan Bob LeChevalier (lojbab) scripsit: > It's an extra syllable, cacr is also not a rafsi for cacra, and I would be > more prone to prefer vocacraC for arbitrary C. "Cacr" indeed is a rafsi for "cacra", a 4-letter rafsi. > >2) Is the objection valid? I think not. Names are arbitrary: if they happen to match cmavo, so much the better. -- John Cowan cowan@ccil.org One art/there is/no less/no more/All things/to do/with sparks/galore --Douglas Hofstadter