From a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com Mon Jul 09 03:34:16 2001
Return-Path: <a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com>
X-Sender: a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_2_0); 9 Jul 2001 10:34:16 -0000
Received: (qmail 84951 invoked from network); 9 Jul 2001 10:34:16 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by l7.egroups.com with QMQP; 9 Jul 2001 10:34:16 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO relay3-gui.server.ntli.net) (194.168.4.200) by mta3 with SMTP; 9 Jul 2001 10:34:16 -0000
Received: from m46-mp1-cvx1b.bir.ntl.com ([62.255.40.46] helo=andrew) by relay3-gui.server.ntli.net with smtp (Exim 3.03 #2) id 15JY7w-0000vj-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Mon, 09 Jul 2001 11:18:52 +0100
To: <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [lojban] Times of Day
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2001 11:33:27 +0100
Message-ID: <LPBBJKMNINKHACNDIIGMEEFAEGAA.a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <ff.8b34f35.28791b39@aol.com>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com>

pc
> In a message dated 7/7/2001 7:50:30 PM Central Daylight Time, 
> edward.cherlin.sy.67@aya.yale.edu writes: 
> 
> Please can we go make the 24-hour clock official? Pretty please? I hate 
> having the hours of the morning (and afternoon) run 
> 
> 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11, or worse 
> 
> XII I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX X XI 
>---------------------------------------------- 
> 
> Grimly enough, the textbook keeps this up even in 24-hour time, calling 
> midnight (and, one supposes, the hour after it) {la revocac}. 

OTOH, a culturally-neutral lg shd be able to adapt itself to diverse
chronometric systems, including the ones that run 12-1-...-11 a.m.+p.m.
and the ones that run 0-...-23. The same goes for feet & inches,
stone and ounces, etc.

But it shdn't be a job for cmene, though. It shd be a lujvo thing.
So "lo relvoncacra", not "la revocac".

--And.

