From a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com Mon Jul 09 09:51:24 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_2_0); 9 Jul 2001 16:51:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 3812 invoked from network); 9 Jul 2001 16:51:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by l7.egroups.com with QMQP; 9 Jul 2001 16:51:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO relay3-gui.server.ntli.net) (194.168.4.200) by mta2 with SMTP; 9 Jul 2001 16:51:08 -0000 Received: from m341-mp1-cvx2b.bre.ntl.com ([62.253.85.85] helo=andrew) by relay3-gui.server.ntli.net with smtp (Exim 3.03 #2) id 15Je0d-0003ko-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Mon, 09 Jul 2001 17:35:44 +0100 To: Subject: RE: cvs access (Re: [lojban] NT translation) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2001 17:50:19 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <01070815201103.00865@linux> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 From: "And Rosta" Bjoern: > it is about time we get webcvs working, so that less technology minded pe= ople=20 > are not closed out, which would hurt the whole project. while i think it = very=20 > important to deeply understand technology one uses, we will have to accep= t=20 > that many people are lacking time, patience or inclination to really get = into=20 > it. i for one have no trouble using cvs, but that is me having experience= =20 > using gnu/linux.=20=20 Indeed. I was hoping to spend a few scattered hours over the summer, while ensconced in the carsey, etc., doing a little translation, not getting to grips with new software.=20 Which is not to say that this CVS thingo doesn't sound like a good thing, or that Robin hasn't taken great pains with it. It's just that a time-press= ed dabbler like me can't be doing with it. --And.