From phma@oltronics.net Sat Jul 14 01:44:46 2001
Return-Path: <phma@ixazon.dynip.com>
X-Sender: phma@ixazon.dynip.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_2_0); 14 Jul 2001 08:44:46 -0000
Received: (qmail 7558 invoked from network); 14 Jul 2001 08:44:45 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by l9.egroups.com with QMQP; 14 Jul 2001 08:44:45 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO neofelis.ixazon.lan) (216.189.29.75) by mta3 with SMTP; 14 Jul 2001 08:44:39 -0000
Received: by neofelis.ixazon.lan (Postfix, from userid 500) id 28A953C55B; Sat, 14 Jul 2001 04:43:08 -0400 (EDT)
Reply-To: phma@oltronics.net
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Taxonomy
Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2001 04:41:08 -0400
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.0.29.2]
Content-Type: text/plain
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <01071404430708.01127@neofelis>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: phma@ixazon.dynip.com
From: Pierre Abbat <phma@oltronics.net>

I have noticed a cladistic bias in the terms used for taxonomy. I am not a
cladist, and even cladists have to talk to non-cladists sometimes, so I feel
there should be words for kingdom, phylum, class, order, family, genus, and
species. Any suggestions?

phma