From phma@oltronics.net Sat Jul 14 01:44:46 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: phma@ixazon.dynip.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_2_0); 14 Jul 2001 08:44:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 7558 invoked from network); 14 Jul 2001 08:44:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by l9.egroups.com with QMQP; 14 Jul 2001 08:44:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO neofelis.ixazon.lan) (216.189.29.75) by mta3 with SMTP; 14 Jul 2001 08:44:39 -0000 Received: by neofelis.ixazon.lan (Postfix, from userid 500) id 28A953C55B; Sat, 14 Jul 2001 04:43:08 -0400 (EDT) Reply-To: phma@oltronics.net To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Taxonomy Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2001 04:41:08 -0400 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.0.29.2] Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01071404430708.01127@neofelis> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: phma@ixazon.dynip.com From: Pierre Abbat I have noticed a cladistic bias in the terms used for taxonomy. I am not a cladist, and even cladists have to talk to non-cladists sometimes, so I feel there should be words for kingdom, phylum, class, order, family, genus, and species. Any suggestions? phma