Subject: vau zo'e

From: "And Rosta" <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 14:31:57 +0100

[resend: seems to have bounced on first send]

I read on the bottom of p345 that (in effect)

1. ga broda gi brode vau zo'e

is equivalent to 

2. ga broda zo'e gi brode zo'e 

rather than to

3. ga broda zo'e goi ko'a gi brode ko'a 

-- this being a peculiarity of zo'e.

I wonder firstly whether this was really intended,
and secondly how to render (3) more succinctly.
As (4)?

4. ga broda gi brode vau ko'a no'u zo'e 

--And.