From a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com Tue Jul 17 06:34:29 2001
Return-Path: <a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com>
X-Sender: a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_2_0); 17 Jul 2001 13:34:28 -0000
Received: (qmail 84924 invoked from network); 17 Jul 2001 13:33:06 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by m8.onelist.org with QMQP; 17 Jul 2001 13:33:06 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO relay3-gui.server.ntli.net) (194.168.4.200) by mta3 with SMTP; 17 Jul 2001 13:33:05 -0000
Received: from m812-mp1-cvx1b.bir.ntl.com ([62.255.43.44] helo=andrew) by relay3-gui.server.ntli.net with smtp (Exim 3.03 #2) id 15MUjE-0002T0-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Tue, 17 Jul 2001 14:17:33 +0100
To: <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [lojban] questions about DOI & cmene
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 14:32:15 +0100
Message-ID: <LPBBJKMNINKHACNDIIGMIEAHEHAA.a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
In-Reply-To: <E15MJBY-0006Sm-00@mercury.ccil.org>
From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com>

John:
> Bob LeChevalier (lojbab) scripsit:
[...]
> > Saying that there was no question of its meaning something doesn't tell me
> > whether it means it or doesn't mean it (I can read it either way), so which
> > are you concluding?
>
> I conclude that "doi cribe" = "doi la cribe" was never considered,
> because that is not what Carter vocatives are for: they are all about
> identifying "do" based on some characteristic such as "girl in the red
> dress". The question was whether that description had to be veridical;
> you said it didn't.

On a different but related point, this seems to conflict with Lojbab
saying "coi girl in the red dress" means "hello, those of you that I
am describing as a girl in the red dress". Lojbab's formulation makes
the description restrict do, implying that the referent of do is
already established, and a subset of them are being greeted. Your
formulation makes the description nonrestrictive, identifying the
referent of do.

--And.


