From phma@oltronics.net Wed Jul 18 04:32:35 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: phma@ixazon.dynip.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_2_0); 18 Jul 2001 11:32:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 76755 invoked from network); 18 Jul 2001 11:32:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by l10.egroups.com with QMQP; 18 Jul 2001 11:32:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO neofelis.ixazon.lan) (216.189.29.67) by mta3 with SMTP; 18 Jul 2001 11:32:26 -0000 Received: by neofelis.ixazon.lan (Postfix, from userid 500) id 0D8323C603; Wed, 18 Jul 2001 07:24:18 -0400 (EDT) Reply-To: phma@oltronics.net To: Subject: RE: [lojban] emerald tablet Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 07:20:30 -0400 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.0.29.2] Content-Type: text/plain References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <0107180724180R.02684@neofelis> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: phma@ixazon.dynip.com From: Pierre Abbat On Tue, 17 Jul 2001, Craig wrote: >Why do I need cu's if there's nothing else that could be a selbri? Because it is possible to answer a question by saying a string of sumti. A string of sumti with no selbri is therefore grammatical, though answering a question with {ko} is anomalous. phma