From jjllambias@hotmail.com Wed Jul 18 08:40:48 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: jjllambias@hotmail.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_2_0); 18 Jul 2001 15:40:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 10705 invoked from network); 18 Jul 2001 15:37:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by l10.egroups.com with QMQP; 18 Jul 2001 15:37:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (216.33.241.98) by mta2 with SMTP; 18 Jul 2001 15:37:46 -0000 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Wed, 18 Jul 2001 08:26:00 -0700 Received: from 200.49.74.2 by lw8fd.law8.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Wed, 18 Jul 2001 15:25:59 GMT X-Originating-IP: [200.49.74.2] To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Bcc: Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Looking down Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 15:25:59 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Jul 2001 15:26:00.0216 (UTC) FILETIME=[F2E06980:01C10F9D] From: "Jorge Llambias" la lojbab cusku di'e >> le gerku cu bacru fa'a le tricu >> >>Interpretation 1 (directional) >> Orientation of event of barking: towards the tree. >> Location of event of barking: unspecified. >> >>Interpretation 2 (locational) >> Orientation of event of barking: unspecified. >> Location of event of barking: somewhere along the line that goes >> from ???? towards the tree. > >OK, given this, I understand FAhA to be locational. We all agree that most FAhA are locational. The point we were discussing was whether {fa'a} and {to'o} in particular followed that pattern as well. In that case {fa'a le tricu} is more or less meaningless, since everywhere in the universe (at least in the connected part) is on a line towards the tree, and the same goes for {to'o le tricu}. And how do you indicate the orientation of the event? mu'o mi'e xorxes _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.