From araizen@newmail.net Thu Jul 19 09:16:29 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: araizen@newmail.net X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_2_0); 19 Jul 2001 16:16:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 69041 invoked from network); 19 Jul 2001 16:15:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l9.egroups.com with QMQP; 19 Jul 2001 16:15:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mu.egroups.com) (10.1.1.40) by mta1 with SMTP; 19 Jul 2001 16:15:45 -0000 X-eGroups-Return: araizen@newmail.net Received: from [10.1.10.94] by mu.egroups.com with NNFMP; 19 Jul 2001 16:15:43 -0000 Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 16:15:41 -0000 To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: questions about DOI & cmene Message-ID: <9j713d+8kat@eGroups.com> In-Reply-To: User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Length: 454 X-Mailer: eGroups Message Poster X-Originating-IP: 62.0.182.91 From: "Adam Raizen" la and cusku di'e > I'm sure she is megaattractive, but I don't think 'attractiveness' is > that great a gloss for 'ka trina', though in fact I can't think of any > way to gloss 'ka trina'. 'Attractiveness' would be a good gloss for > 'ka trina fa ce'u', though. Isn't that by far the most likely meaning of "ka trina"? If "ka trina" doesn't mean "ka ce'u trina", what can it mean, "ka trina ce'u" ("being-attracted-ness", I suppose)? mu'o mi'e adam