From jjllambias@hotmail.com Thu Jul 19 17:58:09 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: jjllambias@hotmail.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_2_0); 20 Jul 2001 00:58:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 34808 invoked from network); 20 Jul 2001 00:58:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l10.egroups.com with QMQP; 20 Jul 2001 00:58:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (216.33.241.162) by mta1 with SMTP; 20 Jul 2001 00:58:08 -0000 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Thu, 19 Jul 2001 17:58:08 -0700 Received: from 200.69.11.73 by lw8fd.law8.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Fri, 20 Jul 2001 00:58:08 GMT X-Originating-IP: [200.69.11.73] To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Bcc: Subject: Re: "tofay" (was: RE: [lojban] registry of experimental cmavo Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 00:58:08 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 20 Jul 2001 00:58:08.0581 (UTC) FILETIME=[0A96F750:01C110B7] From: "Jorge Llambias" la and cusku di'e >Tho I know it's standard, I don't like "cabdei"; it >gives me logical heebiejeebielets. Could you explain why? lo cabdei = da poi cabna je djedi, what's the problem? >I'd prefer: > > mi viska la djan re re'u pa djedi be ca dei I can't see how it would be more logical, as dei is sort of the default se cabna. mu'o mi'e xorxes _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp