From lojbab@lojban.org Fri Jul 20 18:00:05 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojbab@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_2_0); 21 Jul 2001 01:00:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 75420 invoked from network); 21 Jul 2001 01:00:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l9.egroups.com with QMQP; 21 Jul 2001 01:00:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO stmpy-2.cais.net) (205.252.14.72) by mta1 with SMTP; 21 Jul 2001 01:00:03 -0000 Received: from bob.lojban.org (dynamic119.cl7.cais.net [205.177.20.119]) by stmpy-2.cais.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f6L102F76167 for ; Fri, 20 Jul 2001 21:00:03 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20010720210251.00c7d3b0@127.0.0.1> X-Sender: vir1036/pop.cais.com@127.0.0.1 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2 Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 21:03:37 -0400 To: Subject: RE: greeks and love (was RE: [lojban] registry of experimental cmavo - new pr... In-Reply-To: References: <4.3.2.7.2.20010720025758.00c407c0@127.0.0.1> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed From: "Bob LeChevalier (lojbab)" At 10:15 AM 07/20/2001 -0400, Craig wrote: > >>I know there never was any, but there still IS a CLAIM of total ambiguity. > > >Where? Not in anything Lojbanic. > >Did you get the next message I sent? That's supposed to be 'unambiguity.' Yes, and I misread it so as to understand it the way you intended. My answer still applies, therefore. lojbab -- lojbab lojbab@lojban.org Bob LeChevalier, President, The Logical Language Group, Inc. 2904 Beau Lane, Fairfax VA 22031-1303 USA 703-385-0273 Artificial language Loglan/Lojban: http://www.lojban.org