From a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com Fri Jul 20 19:37:57 2001
Return-Path: <a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com>
X-Sender: a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_2_0); 21 Jul 2001 02:37:57 -0000
Received: (qmail 62654 invoked from network); 21 Jul 2001 02:37:56 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l8.egroups.com with QMQP; 21 Jul 2001 02:37:56 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO relay3-gui.server.ntli.net) (194.168.4.200) by mta1 with SMTP; 21 Jul 2001 02:37:56 -0000
Received: from m8-mp1-cvx2c.bre.ntl.com ([62.253.88.8] helo=andrew) by relay3-gui.server.ntli.net with smtp (Exim 3.03 #2) id 15NmPN-0002QW-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Sat, 21 Jul 2001 03:22:21 +0100
To: <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [lojban] kargu mleca
Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2001 03:36:59 +0100
Message-ID: <LPBBJKMNINKHACNDIIGMAEHAEHAA.a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <20010720102653.J20749@digitalkingdom.org>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com>

Robin LP:
> On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 10:33:51AM -0400, Pierre Abbat wrote:
> > The phrase for "I'm looking for something less expensive" is "mi sisku
> > lo'e kargu mleca". Should this be "mi sisku tu'a lo'e kargu mleca" or
> > "mi sisku lo ka kargu mleca"?
> 
> Heh heh.
> 
> Nice to see that someone else forgets about poi:
> 
> mi sisku ko'a poi kargu mleca
> 
> Although I would probably use mleca kargu; why are you doing it the
> other way?

(fi da) mi sisku tu'o ka kargu mleca fa ce'u 

-- x2 of {sisku} is a property. This has been much whinged about, but
that's how it is in the current gismu list. I wouldn't know how to
interpret the versions with {lo'e}.

--And.