From araizen@newmail.net Sat Jul 21 18:53:21 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: araizen@newmail.net X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_2_0); 22 Jul 2001 01:53:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 33285 invoked from network); 22 Jul 2001 01:53:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l8.egroups.com with QMQP; 22 Jul 2001 01:53:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO n15.groups.yahoo.com) (10.1.1.31) by mta1 with SMTP; 22 Jul 2001 01:53:20 -0000 X-eGroups-Return: araizen@newmail.net Received: from [10.1.10.117] by ml.egroups.com with NNFMP; 22 Jul 2001 01:53:20 -0000 Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2001 01:53:19 -0000 To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: Editorial comment Message-ID: <9jdbmf+ospo@eGroups.com> In-Reply-To: User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Length: 584 X-Mailer: eGroups Message Poster X-Originating-IP: 62.0.182.25 From: "Adam Raizen" la and cusku di'e > For example, to take an example raised by Jorge long ago, > does {le (ci) prenu viska vo'a}, does this mean that each person sees each > person (A sees A, B, C, B sees A, B, C, etc.) or does it mean that each > person sees themself? I think it means that each person sees themself. "ci da poi prenu cu viska vo'a" would be the same as "ci da poi prenu cu viska da", since I have no idea what else vo'a might refer to, and so likewise with the "le" form. Each person seeing each person could be expressed as "le'i ci prenu cu visysi'u", perhaps. mu'o mi'e adam