From pycyn@aol.com Sun Jul 22 06:27:49 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: Pycyn@aol.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_2_0); 22 Jul 2001 13:27:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 77920 invoked from network); 22 Jul 2001 13:27:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l8.egroups.com with QMQP; 22 Jul 2001 13:27:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO imo-d03.mx.aol.com) (205.188.157.35) by mta1 with SMTP; 22 Jul 2001 13:27:47 -0000 Received: from Pycyn@aol.com by imo-d03.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v31.9.) id r.6b.1780fe76 (4556) for ; Sun, 22 Jul 2001 09:27:42 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <6b.1780fe76.288c2ece@aol.com> Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2001 09:27:42 EDT Subject: RE: from the classics noch emol To: lojban@yahoogroups.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_6b.1780fe76.288c2ece_boundary" X-Mailer: AOL 6.0 for Windows US sub 10531 From: pycyn@aol.com --part1_6b.1780fe76.288c2ece_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Nick: How about {br} and {ms}? For English speakers anyhow, they will help the association. --part1_6b.1780fe76.288c2ece_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Nick:
<And I don't thinkanyone's going to get brn. and mns. as burna and mensi: the
phonological reduction of B'rer won't have the right stylistic *or*
morphological counterparts in Lojban, so one might as well stick to the
canonical burn.and mens. >
How about {br} and {ms}? For English speakers anyhow, they will help the
association. --part1_6b.1780fe76.288c2ece_boundary--