From nicholas@uci.edu Wed Jul 25 21:18:16 2001
Return-Path: <nicholas@uci.edu>
X-Sender: nicholas@uci.edu
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_2_0); 26 Jul 2001 04:18:16 -0000
Received: (qmail 50259 invoked from network); 26 Jul 2001 04:18:13 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by l10.egroups.com with QMQP; 26 Jul 2001 04:18:13 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO e4e.oac.uci.edu) (128.200.222.10) by mta2 with SMTP; 26 Jul 2001 04:18:13 -0000
Received: from localhost (nicholas@localhost) by e4e.oac.uci.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA03483; Wed, 25 Jul 2001 21:18:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: e4e.oac.uci.edu: nicholas owned process doing -bs
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 21:18:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Sender: <nicholas@e4e.oac.uci.edu>
To: <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
Cc: Nick NICHOLAS <nicholas@uci.edu>
Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Another classic
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.30.0107252116370.8157-100000@e4e.oac.uci.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
From: Nick NICHOLAS <nicholas@uci.edu>


>It doesn't necessarily mean the entire sentence, but you're right
>that we had been misled at some point. Now the Book has set the
>record straight, it's on page 149: "[...] the amount of speech or
>written text referred to by any of these words [di'u et al] is
>vague".

Oh Lord. Is there nothing in this language that's precise any more?
:-1/2 . Very well, I retract.

-- 
== == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == ==
Nick Nicholas, Breathing {le'o ko na rivbi fi'inai palci je tolvri danlu}
nicholas@uci.edu -- Miguel Cervantes tr. Jorge LLambias


