From lojbab@lojban.org Thu Jul 26 20:01:20 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojbab@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_2_0); 27 Jul 2001 03:01:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 17212 invoked from network); 27 Jul 2001 03:01:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by l10.egroups.com with QMQP; 27 Jul 2001 03:01:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO stmpy-5.cais.net) (205.252.14.75) by mta2 with SMTP; 27 Jul 2001 03:01:16 -0000 Received: from bob.lojban.org (1.dynamic.cais.com [207.226.56.1]) by stmpy-5.cais.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f6R31ES35063 for ; Thu, 26 Jul 2001 23:01:15 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20010726225633.00a97f00@127.0.0.1> X-Sender: vir1036/pop.cais.com@127.0.0.1 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2 Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2001 22:59:48 -0400 To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] Tidying notes on {goi} In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed From: "Bob LeChevalier (lojbab)" At 11:01 PM 07/26/2001 +0000, Jorge Llambias wrote: > >But without the {da'o} (or other > >devices for clearing assignments), even {ro da} would be restricted to xy. > > > >I think. This is expansion of Book 16:14 (pp 410-1) > >What happens if The Book is in contradiction with Logic? Which one >wins? During the baseline, the Book wins. However, pc and I are working on a plan to address such issues, which will be discussed at LogFest. I will try to keep people informed as to whether my idea is accepted here and therefore worthy of wider consideration. lojbab -- lojbab lojbab@lojban.org Bob LeChevalier, President, The Logical Language Group, Inc. 2904 Beau Lane, Fairfax VA 22031-1303 USA 703-385-0273 Artificial language Loglan/Lojban: http://www.lojban.org