From jjllambias@hotmail.com Fri Jul 27 16:06:37 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: jjllambias@hotmail.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_2_0); 27 Jul 2001 23:06:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 68628 invoked from network); 27 Jul 2001 23:06:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l8.egroups.com with QMQP; 27 Jul 2001 23:06:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (216.33.241.227) by mta1 with SMTP; 27 Jul 2001 23:06:37 -0000 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Fri, 27 Jul 2001 16:06:37 -0700 Received: from 200.41.247.45 by lw8fd.law8.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Fri, 27 Jul 2001 23:06:37 GMT X-Originating-IP: [200.41.247.45] To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Bcc: Subject: Re: [lojban] RE:{goi} addendum Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2001 23:06:37 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Jul 2001 23:06:37.0248 (UTC) FILETIME=[C98C9400:01C116F0] From: "Jorge Llambias" la pycyn cusku di'e >The reason for the rule on double quantifiers that Lojban uses is almost >certainly the enormous difficulty within logic otherwise of saying >something >like "Three men came into the saloon. Two of them well to the bar. One of >these ordered a lime rickey." One way of saying this without getting into trouble is: le ci nanmu cu nerkla le barja i le re le ci nanmu cu klama le barjyjbu i le pa le re le ci nanmu cu cpedu lo'e ladru mu'o mi'e xorxes _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp