From jjllambias@hotmail.com Fri Jul 27 19:42:11 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: jjllambias@hotmail.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_2_0); 28 Jul 2001 02:42:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 77581 invoked from network); 28 Jul 2001 02:42:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by m8.onelist.org with QMQP; 28 Jul 2001 02:42:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (216.33.241.27) by mta2 with SMTP; 28 Jul 2001 02:42:10 -0000 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Fri, 27 Jul 2001 19:42:10 -0700 Received: from 200.69.11.228 by lw8fd.law8.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Sat, 28 Jul 2001 02:42:10 GMT X-Originating-IP: [200.69.11.228] To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Bcc: Subject: RE: [lojban] Re: goi Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2001 02:42:10 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Jul 2001 02:42:10.0687 (UTC) FILETIME=[E67AC0F0:01C1170E] From: "Jorge Llambias" la and cusku di'e >I hadn't realized that using "ko'a" in this way might still be at all >controversial. That is, I had thought that is was well established that >ko'a series KOhA were not necessarily anaphoric (i.e. do not necessarily >have some antecedent in the discourse). Come to think of it, ko'a series KOhA are _never_ anaphoric, as they must always be assigned with goi, or eventually by context, but they never pick the referent of a previous word the way letter-pronouns, ri-ra-ru and others do. mu'o mi'e xorxes _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp