Subject: Re: [lojban] Tidying notes on {goi}

From: John Cowan <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2001 11:37:02 -0400

Jorge Llambias wrote:

> But {bi'u} already has a different function there. In {le bi'u nanmu
> goi ko'a}, we want ko'a to be the one that gets assigned the referent
> of {le bi'u nanmu}, not the other way around.

Yes, of course; I was too elliptical. I meant "le nanmu goi bi'u ko'a"
marks "ko'a" (the dependent of goi) as definiens; of course "bi'unai"
would mark it as definiendum.

-- 
There is / one art || John Cowan <[email-masked]>
no more / no less || http://www.reutershealth.com
to do / all things || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
with art- / lessness \\ -- Piet Hein