From xod@sixgirls.org Tue Jul 31 23:16:45 2001
Return-Path: <xod@reva.sixgirls.org>
X-Sender: xod@reva.sixgirls.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_2_0); 1 Aug 2001 06:16:44 -0000
Received: (qmail 61041 invoked from network); 1 Aug 2001 06:16:44 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by l8.egroups.com with QMQP; 1 Aug 2001 06:16:44 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO reva.sixgirls.org) (64.152.7.13) by mta3 with SMTP; 1 Aug 2001 06:16:44 -0000
Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by reva.sixgirls.org (8.11.3/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f716GhM02422 for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Wed, 1 Aug 2001 02:16:43 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2001 02:16:43 -0400 (EDT)
To: <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] vliju'a
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0107311843170.30658-100000@party.ice.ru>
Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.4.33.0108010212440.2317-100000@reva.sixgirls.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
From: Invent Yourself <xod@sixgirls.org>

On Tue, 31 Jul 2001, Cyril Slobin wrote:

> On Tue, 31 Jul 2001, Invent Yourself wrote:
>
> > > Is {lo nu djuno cu nu vlipa} a good translation for "knowledge is power"?
>
> > la'e di'u banzu .i se'i mi zmanei lu le kamdjuno du le kamvlipa li'u
>
> ko fraxu mi lenu spuda bau le na'e lojbo, I'm not fluent enough yet. Let
> me try to defend my version:
>
> 1) gardi should be {lo}, not {le}. I do not speak about some cetrain bit
> of knowledge, but about knowledge in general. The same for power-ness.
>
> 2) {du} is irrelevant: knowledge is power, but power is not always
> knowledge. Maybe {me}? But idea of using some cmavo for "is" to keep
> sentence symmery looks fine for me, thank you.



Agreed.



> 3) {nu} vs {ka}. It's hard to express formally, but I feel this is about
> events, not about properties. When I know something, I can something.
> But I am rather week at this point.



I consider "knowledge" to be "the quality of possessing knowledge", more
than "the event of having knowledge". This is only a stylistic point.



> 4) lujvo vs. analytic - matter of taste. I tend not to introduce lujvo
> praeter necessitiam.



I tend to prefer "kambroda" to "ka broda" because then I never have to
close off the "ka" with a "kei". It's more tidy that way.




-----
We do not like And if a cat
those Rs and Ds, needed a hat?
Who can't resist Free enterprise
more subsidies. is there for that!




