From xod@sixgirls.org Thu Aug 02 06:41:01 2001
Return-Path: <xod@reva.sixgirls.org>
X-Sender: xod@reva.sixgirls.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_2_0); 2 Aug 2001 13:41:01 -0000
Received: (qmail 93540 invoked from network); 2 Aug 2001 13:41:00 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l8.egroups.com with QMQP; 2 Aug 2001 13:41:00 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO reva.sixgirls.org) (64.152.7.13) by mta1 with SMTP; 2 Aug 2001 13:41:00 -0000
Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by reva.sixgirls.org (8.11.3/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f72Dex527259 for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Thu, 2 Aug 2001 09:40:59 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2001 09:40:59 -0400 (EDT)
To: <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [lojban] Re: Speaking Lojban
In-Reply-To: <LPBBJKMNINKHACNDIIGMCEANEIAA.a.rosta@ntlworld.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.4.33.0108020939110.27207-100000@reva.sixgirls.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
From: Invent Yourself <xod@sixgirls.org>

On Thu, 2 Aug 2001, And Rosta wrote:

> Out of purely idle (I think) curiosity, if one were to mug up
> in preparation for conversational Lojban, which area ought one
> to be concentrating on? Attitudinals? Gismu? That is, it's
> quite easy to single out the bits one doesn't need at all,
> such as mekso and complicated tense stuff, but less obvious
> (to me) which are the most useful bits for Get By in Lojban.
> --And.



In my opinion, the attitudinals pack more power per word than any other
class. It's good to know about half the gismu though; the half that
doesn't refer to specific animals types etc.




-----
We do not like And if a cat
those Rs and Ds, needed a hat?
Who can't resist Free enterprise
more subsidies. is there for that!




