Subject: Re: [lojban] (C)V'{i|u}V

From: John Cowan <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2001 23:19:36 -0400 (EDT)

And Rosta scripsit:

> Are cmavo of the form (C)V'{i|u}V (e.g. ba'io, bi'ui) legal?

No; the [iu]V diphthongs are permitted only as themselves (i.e.
attitudinals) and in names.

-- 
John Cowan [email-masked]
One art/there is/no less/no more/All things/to do/with sparks/galore
--Douglas Hofstadter