Subject: RE: [lojban] commands

From: Invent Yourself <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2001 14:55:01 -0400 (EDT)

On Fri, 3 Aug 2001, Craig wrote:

> >"lets go" has a different solution, either using ".e'u" for suggestion with
> >a bridi, or if you want an assertive sense "doi mi'o ko cliva
>
> Doesn't allowing .e'u or .e'o to make a command contradict actual usage,
> which is supposed to decide everything? The precedent is that an .e'o or
> .e'u still needs a ko to be a command - {.e'osai ko sarji la lojban.} for
> example.

.e'o ko is redundant.

-----
We do not like And if a cat
those Rs and Ds, needed a hat?
Who can't resist Free enterprise
more subsidies. is there for that!