From arntrich@stud.ntnu.no Fri Aug 03 14:51:33 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: arntrich@stud.ntnu.no X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_2_0); 3 Aug 2001 21:51:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 84781 invoked from network); 3 Aug 2001 21:51:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by l9.egroups.com with QMQP; 3 Aug 2001 21:51:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO brev.stud.ntnu.no) (129.241.56.70) by mta3 with SMTP; 3 Aug 2001 21:51:33 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brev.stud.ntnu.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 339368346 for ; Fri, 3 Aug 2001 23:51:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from jeeves.stud.ntnu.no (jeeves [129.241.56.14]) by brev.stud.ntnu.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94BC08344 for ; Fri, 3 Aug 2001 23:51:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (arntrich@localhost) by jeeves.stud.ntnu.no (8.10.0.Beta12/8.10.0.Beta12) with ESMTP id f73LpVu00853 for ; Fri, 3 Aug 2001 23:51:31 +0200 (MEST) X-Authentication-Warning: jeeves.stud.ntnu.no: arntrich owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2001 23:51:31 +0200 (MEST) To: Subject: RE: [lojban] commands In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS perl-10 From: Arnt Richard Johansen > But we still can't do constructions with it like 'let's go.' It's not a > command to allow us to go, but rather a command directed at multiple people, > including the speaker. Compare it less to 'allow us to go' and more to > Spanish 'vamonos' which is in the imperative. How about "mi joi ko ba zi cliva"? -- mu'o mi'e tsali