From jjllambias@hotmail.com Fri Aug 03 15:43:06 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: jjllambias@hotmail.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_2_0); 3 Aug 2001 22:43:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 18430 invoked from network); 3 Aug 2001 22:43:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by l7.egroups.com with QMQP; 3 Aug 2001 22:43:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (216.33.241.105) by mta2 with SMTP; 3 Aug 2001 22:43:05 -0000 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Fri, 3 Aug 2001 15:43:05 -0700 Received: from 200.41.247.58 by lw8fd.law8.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Fri, 03 Aug 2001 22:43:05 GMT X-Originating-IP: [200.41.247.58] To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Bcc: Subject: Re: [lojban] ce'u (was: vliju'a Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2001 22:43:05 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Aug 2001 22:43:05.0459 (UTC) FILETIME=[A8F2EC30:01C11C6D] From: "Jorge Llambias" la xod cusku di'e >ni'o I recall a while ago I offered an analogy of ka:ce'u::du'u:makau, yet >nobody else thought they were anything alike! But they seem directly >parallel to me. Both are abstractions, and both ce'u and makau focus the >abstraction into a certain place of the abstracted bridi. Every ka has a ce'u, and makau can be used with ka as much as with du'u, so they are not really analogous. For example: {ti ta frica le ka makau mamta ce'u}. mu'o mi'e xorxes _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp