From xod@sixgirls.org Sat Aug 04 13:01:30 2001
Return-Path: <xod@reva.sixgirls.org>
X-Sender: xod@reva.sixgirls.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_2_0); 4 Aug 2001 20:01:30 -0000
Received: (qmail 93093 invoked from network); 4 Aug 2001 20:01:30 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by m8.onelist.org with QMQP; 4 Aug 2001 20:01:30 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO reva.sixgirls.org) (64.152.7.13) by mta1 with SMTP; 4 Aug 2001 20:01:29 -0000
Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by reva.sixgirls.org (8.11.3/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f74K1TE17901 for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Sat, 4 Aug 2001 16:01:29 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2001 16:01:28 -0400 (EDT)
To: <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] Transliterations survey
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.33.0108041903500.14836-100000@jeeves.stud.ntnu.no>
Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.4.33.0108041558510.14985-100000@reva.sixgirls.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
From: Invent Yourself <xod@sixgirls.org>

On Sat, 4 Aug 2001, Arnt Richard Johansen wrote:

> In many of the examples below, one of the candidate transliterations
> have a diphthong where the original has a diphthong. I feel very
> strongly against this.



I don't see how anybody can ever argue for a deviation from the source
language sounds, unless the deviation is imposed upon us by the lerfu.




-----
We do not like And if a cat
those Rs and Ds, needed a hat?
Who can't resist Free enterprise
more subsidies. is there for that!




