From xod@sixgirls.org Sat Aug 04 14:12:49 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: xod@reva.sixgirls.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_2_0); 4 Aug 2001 21:12:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 68241 invoked from network); 4 Aug 2001 21:12:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by l10.egroups.com with QMQP; 4 Aug 2001 21:12:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO reva.sixgirls.org) (64.152.7.13) by mta3 with SMTP; 4 Aug 2001 21:12:49 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by reva.sixgirls.org (8.11.3/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f74LCms25152 for ; Sat, 4 Aug 2001 17:12:48 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2001 17:12:47 -0400 (EDT) To: Subject: du'u & ka (was: ce'u (was: vliju'a In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII From: Invent Yourself On Sat, 4 Aug 2001, And Rosta wrote: > I *think* I recall a weak consensus that du'u = ce'u-less ka, > which implies that ka must contain an implicit or explicit > ce'u. I recall Cowan saying something like this too. I would love to hear more about this! ----- We do not like And if a cat those Rs and Ds, needed a hat? Who can't resist Free enterprise more subsidies. is there for that!