Subject: du'u & ka (was: ce'u (was: vliju'a

From: Invent Yourself <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2001 17:12:47 -0400 (EDT)

On Sat, 4 Aug 2001, And Rosta wrote:

> I *think* I recall a weak consensus that du'u = ce'u-less ka,
> which implies that ka must contain an implicit or explicit
> ce'u.

I recall Cowan saying something like this too. I would love to hear more
about this!

-----
We do not like And if a cat
those Rs and Ds, needed a hat?
Who can't resist Free enterprise
more subsidies. is there for that!