From jorge@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx.xxx Mon May 31 09:19:02 1999 X-Digest-Num: 154 Message-ID: <44114.154.919.959273824@eGroups.com> Date: Mon, 31 May 1999 13:19:02 -0300 From: "=?iso-8859-1?Q?Jorge_J._Llamb=EDas?=" After reconsidering the issue, I think you have to consider linked sumti >on the tertau as fixing some of the places, in effect producing a new >selbri which has fewer places (somewhat like the function of zi'o). That's reasonable. Then {ko'a broda be fa ko'e} puts ko'a in the broda2 place. >If that was bad, I'm starting to wonder what happens if there is >conversion present as well. e.g. things like > >A fo B te ke se broda be C ke'e be D be'o E I hadn't thought of that. You can actually use just fa to tag every different position of a predicate: xe ke ve ke te ke se ke klama be fa A ke'e be fa B ke'e be fa C ke'e be fa D fa E is equivalent to: A klama B C D E >start to look awfully complex. I think I'll just let my program give up >with something like this! Those are all algorithmic, a program shouldn't have too much trouble with them as long as there are no rule conflicts. As for us mere mortals... co'o mi'e xorxes