Subject: Re: tu'o (was: ce'u (was: vliju'a

From: [email-masked]
Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2001 14:27:28 -0000

la lojbab cusku di'e

> Since it is elliptical, it has unspecified value which is to be 
inferred 
> from context if important. 
[...] 
> For the same reason, we do not presume that zo'e stands for "noda".

I think the counterpart of {zo'e} should be {no'o}, not {tu'o}.
{tu'o} is the counterpart of {zi'o}. At least that's what "used 
in unary operations" suggests to me.

mu'o mi'e xorxes