From jjllambias@hotmail.com Sun Aug 05 07:34:58 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: jjllambias@hotmail.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_2_0); 5 Aug 2001 14:34:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 81299 invoked from network); 5 Aug 2001 14:34:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l10.egroups.com with QMQP; 5 Aug 2001 14:34:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (216.33.241.10) by mta1 with SMTP; 5 Aug 2001 14:34:57 -0000 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Sun, 5 Aug 2001 07:34:56 -0700 Received: from 200.69.11.40 by lw8fd.law8.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Sun, 05 Aug 2001 14:34:56 GMT X-Originating-IP: [200.69.11.40] To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Bcc: Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: ka + makau (was: ce'u (was: vliju'a Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2001 14:34:56 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Aug 2001 14:34:56.0930 (UTC) FILETIME=[CC739020:01C11DBB] From: "Jorge Llambias" la ~mark cusku di'e >I thought that {jei}!={du'u xukau} and that was one of the reasons for >{kau} in the first place. Correct me if I misremember. It was >something along the lines of {le jei broda} means either "true" or >"false"... to the extent that truth or falsity can be substituted for >it. Those are the two competing meanings, yes. None of them is winning, as far as I can tell. At least I never use it with either sense. mu'o mi'e xorxes _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp