From phma@oltronics.net Sun Aug 05 07:57:46 2001
Return-Path: <phma@ixazon.dynip.com>
X-Sender: phma@ixazon.dynip.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_2_0); 5 Aug 2001 14:57:45 -0000
Received: (qmail 69890 invoked from network); 5 Aug 2001 14:57:45 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by l8.egroups.com with QMQP; 5 Aug 2001 14:57:45 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO neofelis.ixazon.lan) (216.189.29.70) by mta3 with SMTP; 5 Aug 2001 14:57:41 -0000
Received: by neofelis.ixazon.lan (Postfix, from userid 500) id C9B853C5BD; Sun, 5 Aug 2001 10:54:40 -0400 (EDT)
Reply-To: phma@oltronics.net
To: <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: soi vo'a and embedded bridi
Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2001 10:53:45 -0400
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.0.29.2]
Content-Type: text/plain
References: <4.3.2.7.2.20010804232434.00c2a100@pop.cais.com>
In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20010804232434.00c2a100@pop.cais.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <01080510544000.28640@neofelis>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: phma@ixazon.dynip.com
From: Pierre Abbat <phma@oltronics.net>

On Sat, 04 Aug 2001, Bob LeChevalier (lojbab) wrote:
>soi ri, I think, since soi is attached to la deiv. (I'm willing to be 
>proven wrong on this if the book says otherwise, but failing that, I would 
>treat free modifiers attached to a sumti as if they were a kind of relative 
>clauses or phrase (and indeed they are, since the soi X could be replaced 
>by a noi bridi) and use ke'a to refer to the sumti they are attached to. 
>(Free mods can attach to other things of course.))

But wouldn't "soi ri" just exchange Dave with Dave?

phma

